Certain Proposals Appear Warranted, but May Benefit From Legislative Oversight We recommend that the Legislature direct HSRA to apply the same approach to calculating the administrative cap for state staff and contractors. This is important because it delays a natural opportunity for legislative oversight. HSRA estimates its revised approach to calculating the administrative cap will result in HSRA reaching the cap roughly three years later than previously anticipated (2023‑ 24 rather than 2020‑21). 5 percent of bond proceeds, but allows the Legislature to raise it to up to 5 percent by statute.) Under its revised approach, HSRA will have an inconsistent method for how it categorizes state and contract staff who perform similar functions. The budget reflects a change in HSRA’s approach to calculating the administrative cap allowed under Proposition 1A (2008). Therefore, we recommend the Legislature withhold action on the request until later in the spring when additional information might be available to determine the appropriate staffing level. Although it is clear that the program requires additional ongoing resources, it is unclear whether the proposed positions and funds would fully address the workload because DMV ( 1) is currently in the process of implementing changes to improve workflow efficiency that would likely impact the level of staffing needed and ( 2) will be meeting a federal processing requirement in the upcoming primary election for the first time since implementing workflow improvements. 1 million ongoing) from the General Fund to support 38 new positions for the Motor Voter program. The Governor’s budget includes an additional $6. These questions include: ( 1) what is the scope of the problem, ( 2) what are the most effective approaches, ( 3) what level of resources is appropriate, ( 4) what is the appropriate fund source, and ( 5) who should lead the effort?ĭMV-Motor Voter Workload. To the extent the Legislature would like to direct more resources towards combatting illicit vaping products, we recommend that it consider various questions as it develops its preferred policy approach. However, it is unclear whether the Governor’s proposal would be the most effective approach. Given the number of illnesses and deaths attributed to illicit vaping products in recent years, it is reasonable for the Governor and the Legislature to be concerned and want to address this potentially growing public health problem. The Governor proposes to fund the task force with a new tax on vaping products. The Governor’s budget includes $ 7 million in ongoing funding to form a task force led by CHP to investigate the manufacturing, transportation, distribution, and sales of illicit vaping devices. A Few Proposals to Implement New or Recently Enacted Policy ChangesĬHP-E‑Cigarette Tax Enforcement. This includes an estimated increase of $ 626 million ( 5 percent) from 2019‑ 20 to 2020‑21. 4 billion in 2016‑ 17 to a projected $12.
#Budget trucking driver
(Senate Bill 1 did not change vehicle registration or driver license fees that primarily support CHP and DMV.) Since the enactment of S B 1, state revenue collected from fuel taxes and vehicle fees has grown from $6. In 2017, the Legislature enacted Chapter 5 (S B 1, Beall), which increased various fuel taxes and vehicle fees that support California’s transportation system, particularly state highways, local streets and roads, and transit. State Transportation Revenues Doubled Since S B 1. 4 billion for the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), $ 1 billion for state transit assistance, and $ 400 million for various other transportation programs.
7 billion for the California Highway Patrol (CHP), $1. 9 billion for the High‑Speed Rail Authority (HSRA), $2. 5 billion for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), $ 3 billion for local streets and roads, $2. 4 billion, or 14 percent, over estimated expenditures for the current year. 9 billion from all fund sources for the state’s transportation departments and programs in 2020‑21. The Governor’s budget provides a total of $26. Total Proposed Spending of $26.9 Billion. Executive Summary Overview of Governor’s Transportation Budget